DON was so bad, it should not be called a remake cos it did not 'make' anything but destroy the original. It should be called a 'screwup'.
Now I hear that a bigger moron is trying to remake Sholay, the greatest movie in the history of mankind.
People high on crack should not be allowed to make movie!! I mean Sholay? It is like me trying to remake Coca Cola. I'll end up making monkey piss if I did that (not that I have tasted monkey piss).
And that's what this director is going to do: Screwup Sholay - I have no doubt about it. Someone shoot this guy before he completes the film. He is a bigger threat than Gabbar himself.
Now I hear Amar Akbar Anthony, Chupke Chupke, and Satte Pe Satta (all Bachchan classics, mind you!) are going to be remade.
Why jackasses, why? Can't your termite infested brains not borrow something from Hollywood instead? You guys are good at it anyway.
You might say there is nothing wrong in remakes. King Kong has had as many remakes as Laloo Prasad Yadav's kids and Elizabeth Taylor's marriages. Well, you are wrong!
There is something greatly wrong. Movies like King Kong should be remade because they have special effects which get better. So instead of the 1933 classic that used a plastic monkey, you can have a computer generated one (in the new one though you had Michael Jackson without make up playing the title role). Sholay, Satte Pe Satta etc used no special effects. There is nothing to add, only things to subtract. Get it, morons?
![]() | |
| 1933 King Kong with a plastic monkey | 2005 King Kong with Michael Jackson |
So what is this remake shit anyway, and why do people do it?
Well lets see...
Remakes are not a new concept. The 1994 live action marriage documentary called Hum Aapke Hain Koun was a remake of an old film called Nadiya Ke Paar that starred two actors no one cares about.
Then Dil To Pagal Hai, Kuch Kuch Hota Hai, and Veer Zaara were remakes of Dilwale Dulhaniya Le Jayenge, although they didn't admit it.
They followed the same story: SRK loves a girl who is getting married to some other guy. After 2+ hours of glycerine, SRK gets the girl in the last frame. Yay!
I can't imagine they made 4 films on the same subject and they all minted cash while we could not accept 3 Bhagat Singh films! Weird people we Indians are.
Anyway, what is the motivation behind remaking? The morons who make the remake claim it is to bring 'old art' to the 'new generation'. Total BS (read as BullS**t)! Why don't they remake the art movies of Naseruddin Shah like Sparsh? Why only the superhits of the past?
So the incentive seems simple - "proven formula hai bhaiya paisa banane ka" ("Its a proven formula to mint money").
And anyway, originality is always optional when it comes to our movies and we have seen we are as incapable of coming up with something new as a Maruti 800 winning a 100m race against a Ferrari.
So, my advice is: Please don't touch the originals! Leave them as they are. But considering how incapable you guys are in coming up with something original, here is some gyan for you:
1. If you want to copy, copy from Hollywood. They make better movies anyway! And less people have seen the original.
2. Please cast the characters properly. One part of a remake is to see how modern icons play the old ones. Eg SRK playing Bachchan in DON. Here is an example on how not to cast:
RGV Ke Sholay
- Bachchan is Gabbar: Why Mr Bachchan why? Why did you want some mentally retarded fella meddle with your classic?
- Devgan is Veeru: Well.. if there is one person in the who feels that Devgan can play a philanderer like Dharamji, i'll marry Rakhi Sawant and endure a painful life.
- Some newbie is Jai: Tell me, how can some anonymous guy who looks worse than Uday Chopra pull off a character immortalized by Bachchan.
- Nisha Kothari is Basanti: Nisha, I love you. Marry me please.
- Sushmita is Radha: Guys comm'on.. Sushmita is an Alpha Female. She cannot play a sad widow. I think Rakhi Sawant playing Meerabai is more appropriate than this.
- Mohanlal is Thakur Baldev Singh: I like Mohanlal but in my wildest imaginations, he is not stylish. Sanjeev Kumar was stylish, the way he spoke with a permanent anger. Mohanlal.. no no no.
Well here is what it should have been:
Laloo Prasad Yadav as Gabbar
Saif as Veeru
Akshay Kumar as Jai
Amisha Patel as Basanti
Amrita Rao as Radha
Atal Bihari Yajpayee as Thakur Baldev Singh
See Ram Gopal, doesn't this make my movie more interesting than yours in an instant? And you did months of research to get your morons (that doesn't include you Bachchanji and Nisha.. muah!).
But well, I'll never dare to remake Sholay.
So next time you decide to screwup a classic. Use some of my gyan.
3. Please don't use songs of the originals. That's the least you can do. I see enough remixes with women wearing my 3 year old sister's skirts. I don't need remixes in movies too.
I'll keep the gyan short as I know you guys are too stupid to absorb much anyway.
So that's what remakes are - screwups of the classics. I hope one day some iota of intelligence goes into the brains of our filmmakers and they decide to end their sacrilegious practices.










